Great thkinnig! That really breaks the mold! http://yzofxptpeb.com [url=http://gwmitmlqwi.com]gwmitmlqwi[/url] [link=http://qzbitehjf.com]qzbitehjf[/link]
Sorry, quick follow up.In your eapxmle:a.b.OnFoo.Add(new Events.EventHandler(a.handleFoo))Supposing this is the actual method:a.handleFoo = function(src, ea) {this.something = something ; // this would be on a src.something = somethingElse ; // this would be on b }Make sense? By passing the object that fired the event as the first arg to the handler function, I'm able (through some trickery in Events.Listener.Invoke) to preserve the scope of the original handler function, while passing the object that fired the event.Honestly, for me it's made writing event-based code a lot simpler; I don't have to worry about the problem that you posted about at all now, since I know that this will always refer to the lexical scope that I defined in the first place.(It's for things like this that I love Javascript, btw) http://wlkzkenxo.com [url=http://hsswzrsi.com]hsswzrsi[/url] [link=http://hjnrblqdsho.com]hjnrblqdsho[/link]
I would say Daveduck makes both a very good and a very grumpy point. Daveduck, I only fear that<a href="http://dirvniktlp.com"> prapehs</a> some aspect of the message of this particular post was lost on you (or<a href="http://dirvniktlp.com"> prapehs</a> you simply ignored it):- _Even_ when the panel system is fully documented (at some point in the future), it will _still_ be confusing, because it is poorly designed.Now that panel system will be documented more fully some time mid beta I am working with Max to update our default C172 to use v930 features; once this is done I want to use it as an example to build some tutorials in the new tech.But some percentage of the confusion I see re: panel authoring comes not from under-documentation (which IS a real problem), but from mix match that is, people trying to use combinations of the panel system that don't play well together, and getting unexpected results.
Thanks Paul and Walt for this great discussion! I am going to jump in and ask a qeuotisn now because you've got my curiosity up.The use of a' in some of those constructions, like Ella le cepilla los dientes a su hija , looks confusing to me because I think that it appears to use the personal a' for an indirect animate object, rather than the direct object. I thought about it and I was wondering if it occurs because of the manner in which Spanish identifies body parts, as in Me duele la cabeza , saying the head rather than my head as we would in English. So, perhaps in the example sentence above, su hija is treated as the direct object, since los dientes is her body part?I did a search for this type of construction on Google and I found both Ella le cepilla los dientes a su hija and Ella le cepilla los dientes de su hija , with the de' form being more common. It looked like a su hija constructions come more often from writers in Mexico too, but that's just based on about three examples I found. However, to my Intermediate Spanish mind, the construction using los dientes de su hija is a lot easier to grasp.Thanks again, guys!